When Sahibzada Farhan raised his bat like an AK-47 and mimicked firing it after reaching a half-century in the Asia Cup 2025 Super Four match against India, he didn’t just celebrate a personal milestone—he ignited a firestorm. The moment, captured on camera at the Dubai International Stadium on September 21, 2025, came just days after the Pahalgam terror attack that killed over 25 civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir. For millions of Indian fans, it wasn’t a spontaneous celebration—it was a brutal, calculated provocation. The Pakistan national cricket team had already lost the match by six wickets, but Farhan’s gesture became the defining story of the game.
Timing That Felt Like a Taunt
The match unfolded under heavy emotional weight. Just one week earlier, militants attacked a pilgrimage site in Pahalgam, leaving families shattered and India’s national mood somber. In the group stage, India’s Suryakumar Yadav had dedicated their win over Pakistan to the armed forces and victims of the attack. That moment of unity, broadcast live across the subcontinent, made Farhan’s celebration feel less like a cricketing exuberance and more like a political jab. Social media exploded. Twitter user
@mayankglt, a respected sports analyst, wrote: “How much more mockery our Army will you allow?? Shame.” Another user,
@MrigendraSpeaks, called it “shamelessness for the sake of money.” The video of Farhan’s celebration was shared over 12 million times in 48 hours.
Farhan’s Defense: ‘I Didn’t Care’
By Monday, September 22, 2025, Farhan addressed reporters at a press conference ahead of Pakistan’s next match against Sri Lanka. His response was chilling in its indifference. “That just happened in the moment,” he said. “I don’t usually celebrate after a fifty. But it came to my mind today. I don’t know how people will react—and frankly, I don’t care.” In another version reported by
Times of India, he added: “Aggressive cricket should be played against every team, not just India.” The phrasing was telling. He didn’t apologize. He didn’t clarify. He doubled down on aggression as a principle, ignoring the context entirely. That silence, more than the gesture itself, fueled the outrage.
ICC’s Response: A Warning and a Fine
The
Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) didn’t stay silent. They filed a formal complaint with the
International Cricket Council (ICC). The outcome? Farhan received a formal warning, while his teammate
Haris Rauf was fined 30% of his match fee for a separate “jet down” celebration—mocking Indian fans by pretending to fly over them. Critics called the punishment light. After all, Farhan’s gesture carried the weight of real-world violence. Yet the ICC, bound by its code of conduct that prohibits “conduct contrary to the spirit of the game,” stopped short of a suspension. Their statement cited “lack of explicit intent to incite hatred,” a legal loophole many found deeply flawed.
Repeating the Mistake
Even after the backlash, Farhan didn’t back down. Weeks later, during a promotional photoshoot for a Pakistani sports brand, he repeated the AK-47 gesture—this time in full uniform, grinning at the camera. The video, leaked on social media, was met with global condemnation. Cricket legends like Wasim Akram and Sachin Tendulkar, both known for avoiding political statements on the field, broke their silence. “Cricket is a game,” Tendulkar said in an interview. “But it’s also a mirror. And right now, it’s showing us something ugly.” The brand,
Sting Sports, quietly pulled the campaign, but Farhan’s image had already been cemented in the public consciousness—as a symbol of recklessness, not resilience.
The Final Act: Silence in the Final
The twist came on September 28, 2025, in the Asia Cup final. Farhan scored another fifty—this time 54 off 51 balls. But this time, no bat-gun. No theatrics. Just a nod to his partner and a quiet raise of the helmet. India won again, chasing Pakistan’s 171/5 with six wickets in hand. Was it remorse? Or just damage control? No one knows for sure. But the silence spoke louder than any celebration ever could. Fans noticed. Analysts noted it. Even Pakistan’s own commentators, usually loyal, questioned whether the gesture had done more harm than good to the team’s reputation.
Why This Matters Beyond Cricket
This wasn’t just about a player’s poor judgment. It exposed how deeply sports and politics are entangled in South Asia. Cricket is more than a game here—it’s a proxy for national pride, trauma, and identity. When a player performs a gesture tied to a weapon used in terror attacks, especially after a massacre of civilians, it doesn’t just offend—it wounds. The ICC’s tepid response raised questions about whether global sports bodies are equipped—or willing—to handle politically charged acts on the field. If this is what “aggressive cricket” looks like, then the game itself is at risk of becoming a battleground.
What’s Next?
Farhan’s future in international cricket remains uncertain. While he’s not suspended, his image has been tarnished. Sponsorships may vanish. Team management may distance themselves. And India’s BCCI has hinted at pushing for stricter disciplinary guidelines ahead of the 2026 T20 World Cup. Meanwhile, young cricketers across Pakistan are now being coached on “emotional intelligence” in high-stakes matches—not just technique. The message is clear: talent alone isn’t enough. Responsibility matters.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Sahibzada Farhan’s celebration considered offensive?
The AK-47 gesture was seen as a direct reference to the weapon used in the Pahalgam terror attack, which killed over 25 civilians just days before the match. In a region where cricket carries deep emotional weight, such symbolism isn’t viewed as playful—it’s interpreted as mocking victims and glorifying violence. The timing made it feel intentional, not impulsive.
Did the ICC take strong enough action?
Many experts say no. Farhan received only a formal warning, while his teammate Haris Rauf was fined 30% for a less provocative gesture. Critics argue the ICC prioritized avoiding diplomatic conflict over upholding ethical standards. With no suspension or mandatory sensitivity training, the punishment felt like a symbolic gesture—insufficient to deter future acts.
Why did Farhan stop the celebration in the final?
While Farhan never publicly explained the change, analysts believe it was strategic. With global media attention and potential sponsorship fallout, repeating the gesture risked permanent damage to his career. The silence in the final may have been a quiet admission that the celebration crossed a line—even if he refused to say so outright.
How did Indian fans react beyond social media?
Beyond online outrage, Indian fans organized peaceful protests outside Pakistani consulates in cities like Mumbai and Delhi. Some fans burned replica cricket bats with AK-47 motifs. The BCCI received over 150,000 signed petitions demanding disciplinary action. The emotional response was raw, personal—and deeply tied to the grief still fresh from Pahalgam.
Has this affected future India-Pakistan cricket matches?
Yes. The BCCI has reportedly requested the ICC to introduce mandatory pre-match cultural sensitivity briefings for players in high-tension fixtures. Additionally, broadcasters are now under pressure to blur or cut away from celebrations deemed potentially inflammatory. The incident has permanently altered how these matches are managed—not just on the field, but behind the scenes.
Is this the first time a cricket celebration caused international outrage?
No. In 2019, Australian player Steve Smith faced backlash for a “shame” hand gesture after India’s Virat Kohli was dismissed, sparking a diplomatic note from India. In 2007, Pakistan’s Shahid Afridi was fined for a provocative celebration after dismissing Sachin Tendulkar. But this is the first time a celebration has directly invoked a real-world terror weapon during a period of national mourning—making it uniquely volatile.